Estimating the 100-year Peak Flow for Ungagged Middle Creek Watershed in Northern California, USA

Saad Merayyan^1, and Jeremy Hill²

¹Department of Civil Engineering, California State University, Sacramento, CA, USA

²California Department of Water Resources, Sacramento, CA, USA

Cite this paper

Saad Merayyan and Jeremy Hill. Estimating the 100-year Peak Flow for Ungagged Middle Creek Watershed in Northern California, USA. American Journal of Water Resources. 2014; 2(4):99-105. doi: 10.12691/AJWR-2-4-3

Abstract

This study presents a case study for estimating the 100-year peak flow for Middle Creek Watershed in Northern California. The watershed contains several stream flow gages; however, the precipitation data is only available as daily data, which was not usable form for this study. Thus considering that the watershed to be ungagged. In order to overcome this shortcoming in the hydrologic analysis, other approaches were considered. Therefore, the precipitation point frequency estimates were obtained from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Atlas 14. The Hydrologic Engineering Center’s Hydrologic Modeling System (HMS) was used to create the hydrologic model to estimate the peak flows at key points in the watershed. The purpose of using the HMS model was to predict eh rainfall-runoff analysis for this watershed, which only has steam gage data. Other parameters needed for the HMS model were obtained from various sources as suggested in the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Central Valley Hydrology Study (CVHS): Technical procedures document. The 100-year flows from the HMS model results were then calibrated/validated by comparing to the 100-year flow frequency curves computed using the Hydrologic Engineering Center’s Flood Frequency Analysis (FFA) program, FEMA USACE, and USGS Regression methods. Sensitivity analysis of several of the model parameters was analyzed to determine the results confidence level. The HMS modeled results were in good agreement with the results obtained from the Flood Frequency method and the USGS regression studies. The procedure described herein for developing and validating hydrologic models for ungagged watersheds can be used for other similar ungagged watersheds.

Keywords

HEC-HMS, partially gagged watersheds, computational methods, flooding

Copyright

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References

[1]	FEMA. Flood Insurance Study –Lake County, California and Unincorporated Areas. 2005 (Analysis performed in 1976 and republished in the FIS dated Sep 30, 2005).
[2]	Jennings, M.E., et al., 1993. Nationwide summary of U.S. Geological Survey regional regression equations for estimating magnitude and frequency of floods for ungaged sites. U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations Report 94-4002. http://pubs.usgs.gov/wri/1994/4002/report.pdf.
[3]	National Land Cover Database 2006, U.S. Geological Survey, National Map Viewer, http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/).
[4]	NOAA. Hydrometeorological Report No. 59. Probable Maximum Precipitation for California. 1999
[5]	Parrett, Charles, et al., 2006. Regional Skew for California, and Flood Frequency for Selected Sites in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin, Based on Data through Water Year 2006. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2010-5260. http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2010/5260/.
[6]	Sacramento City/County.Sacramento City/County Drainage Manual. 2006.
[7]	Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database (U.S. Natural Resources Conservation Service, Soil Data Mart. http://soildatamart.nrcs.usda.gov/)USACE. Design Memorandum No. 1 – Hydrology for Middle Creek Project. 1956. p. 11.
[8]	USACE. Hydrologic modeling system HEC-HMS technical reference manual. Davis, CA: Hydrologic Engineering Center; 2000.
[9]	USACE, Hydrologic modeling system HEC-HMS user’s manual, Davis, CA: Hydrologic Engineering Center; 2001.
[10]	USACE. Central Valley Hydrology Study (CVHS): Ungaged watershed analysis procedures. 2010.
[11]	WRC. Guidelines for Determining Flood Flow Frequency: Bulletin #17B. 1982.