Evaluation of Photoreactivation and Dark Repair of Total and Fecal Coliforms and Enterococci in Wastewater Treated with Ultraviolet Light

J.J. Dragoni-Rosado^1, , G. Tavárez-Hernández¹, A. González-Mederos¹ and A.E. Pérez-Matos²

¹Department of Science and Technology, Inter American University of Puerto Rico, San Germán, Puerto Rico

²Biotechnology and Agrobiotechnology Research and Learning Center, Department of Natural Sciences, Pontifical Catholic University of Puerto Rico, Ponce, Puerto Rico

Cite this paper

J.J. Dragoni-Rosado, G. Tavárez-Hernández, A. González-Mederos and A.E. Pérez-Matos. Evaluation of Photoreactivation and Dark Repair of Total and Fecal Coliforms and Enterococci in Wastewater Treated with Ultraviolet Light. American Journal of Water Resources. 2022; 10(2):54-58. doi: 10.12691/AJWR-10-2-3

Abstract

Wastewater treatment plants are essential in reducing the microbial load of water discharged into the ecosystems by UV light. However, it has been found that some pathogenic bacteria have developed mechanisms to reverse the damage caused to their DNA by UV light, with possible adverse effects on the environment and human health. Therefore, this research evaluated if fecal indicator bacteria that use photoreactivation or dark repair are present in the wastewater from a treatment plant in Puerto Rico. Samples of wastewater treated with UV light were collected and exposed to two treatments: fluorescent light (photoreactivation) and darkness (dark repair). The number of colonies of total coliforms, fecal coliforms, and enterococci was determined every hour of exposure. Results show that after exposure to fluorescent light, the number of colonies of total and fecal coliforms increased, being able to repair and reverse the damage caused to their DNA when exposed to visible light but not in darkness, possibly through the mechanism of photoreactivation. However, enterococci showed no increase in colonies when exposed to fluorescent light and kept in darkness. These results suggest reviewing the disinfection process considering photoreactivation and dark repair mechanisms. The new considerations can reduce pollution of watersheds when large amounts of treated wastewater are released into the environment.

Keywords

bacteria, sewage, disinfection, water, enterobacteria

Copyright

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References

[1]	United States Environmental Protection Agency. Effluent Guidelines, 2022.
[2]	Ehalt-Macedo, H., Lehner, B., Nicell, J., Grill, G., Li, J., Limtong, A. and Shakya, R., “Distribution and characteristics of wastewater treatment plants within the global river network,” Earth System Science Data, 14, pp.559-577, 2022.
[3]	EL Shahawy, A., El-Shatoury, S., Bayomi, S. and El-Monayeri, D., “Wastewater Disinfection Using Artificial Ultraviolet Rays Technology.” In: Unconventional Water Resources and Agriculture in Egypt. Ed: Negm, A.M., Springer International Publishing, Egypt, 2018.
[4]	Bonetta, S., Pignata, C., Gasparro, E., Richiardi, L., Bonetta S. and Carraro, E., “Impact of wastewater treatment plants on microbiological contamination for evaluating the risks of wastewater reuse,” Environmental Sciences Europe, 34 (20), pp. 1-13, 2022.
[5]	International Organization for Standardization. ISO 15727: 2020 - Measurement of the output of a UV-C lamp (2020-01), Geneva, Switzerland, 2020.
[6]	Fitzhenry, K., Clifford, E., Rowan, N. and Val del Rio, A., “Bacterial inactivation, photoreactivation and dark repair post flow-through pulsed UV disinfection,” Journal of Water Process Engineering, 41, pp. 1-9, 2021.
[7]	Bohrerova, Z. and Linden, K., “Standardizing photoreactivation: Comparison of DNA photorepair rate in Escherichia coli using four different fluorescent lamps,” Water Research, 41 (12), pp. 2832-2838, 2007.
[8]	Kavakli, I.H., Ozturk, N. and Gul, S., “Chapter One - DNA repair by photolyases,” In: Advances in Protein Chemistry and Structural Biology. Ed: R. Donev, Academic Press, 2019, pp. 1-19.
[9]	Pathak, J., Rajneesh, Singh, P., Häder, D. and Sinha, R., “UV-induced DNA damage and repair: A cyanobacterial perspective,” Plant Gene, 19, pp. 1-12, 2019.
[10]	Locas, A., Demers, J., and Payment, P., “Evaluation of photoreactivation of Escherichia coli and enterococci after UV disinfection of municipal wastewater,” Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 54 (11), pp. 971-975, 2008.
[11]	Selby, C., Linsey-Boltz, L., Yang, Y. and Sancar, A., “Mycobacteria excise DNA damage in 12- or 13-nucleotide-long oligomers by prokaryotic-type dual incisions and performs transcription-coupled repair,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 295 (50), pp. 17374-17380, 2020.
[12]	Krasikova, Y., Rechkunova, N. and Lavrik, O., “Nucleotide excision repair: From molecular defects to neurological abnormalities,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22 (12), pp. 1-23, 2021.
[13]	Salcedo, I., Andrade, J., Quiroga, J. and Nebot., E., “Photoreactivation and Dark Repair in UV-Treated Microorganisms: Effect of Temperature,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 73 (5), pp. 1594-1600, 2007.
[14]	Edokpayi, J., Odiyo, J. and Durowoju, O., “Impact of wastewater on surface water quality in developing countries: A case study of South Africa.” In: Water Quality. Ed: Tutu, H., Intech Open, 2017, 401-416.
[15]	United States Environmental Protection Agency. Method 1603: Escherichia coli (E. coli) in Water by Membrane Filtration Using Modified membrane-Thermotolerant Escherichia coli Agar (Modified mTEC), 2014.
[16]	Xu, L., and Zhu, G., “The roles of several residues of Escherichia coli DNA photolyase in the highly efficient photo-repair of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers,” Journal of Nucleic Acids, 2010, pp. 1-7, 2010.
[17]	Lara, G., Navarro, M. and Altamiranda, J., “Estudio de fotoreactivación en cultivos microbiológicos obtenidos de carga microbiana de la superficie de fresas sometidas a diferentes dosis de luz ultravioleta de onda corta UV-C,” Revista Colombiana de Investigaciones Agroindustriales, 5(1), pp. 32-40, 2018.
[18]	Shafaei, S., Bolton, J. R., and Gamal El Din, M., “Effect of environmental factors on photoreactivation of microorganisms under indoor conditions,” International Journal of Environmental and Ecological Engineering, 10(5), pp. 560-563, 2016.
[19]	Shafaei, S., Klamerth, N., Zhang, Y., McPhedran, K., Bolton, J. R., and Gamal El-Din, M., “Impact of environmental conditions on bacterial photoreactivation in wastewater effluents,” Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts, 19, 31-37, 2017.
[20]	Zimmer, J., and Slawson, R., “Potential repair of Escherichia coli DNA following exposure to UV radiation from both medium and low-pressure UV sources used in drinking water treatment.” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68(7), pp. 3293-3299, 2002.
[21]	Quek, P. and Hu, J., “Indicators for photoreactivation and dark repair studies following ultraviolet disinfection,” Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, 35(6), pp. 533-541, 2008.
[22]	Chen, P.Y., Chu, X. N., Liu, L., Hu, J.Y., “Effects of salinity and temperature on inactivation and repair potential of Enterococcus faecalis following medium- and low-pressure ultraviolet irradiation,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, 120, pp. 816-825, 2015.
[23]	Wang, X.-F., Gong, X., Hu, X.-L., & Ren, B.-Z., “Photoreactivation of Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecalis in the secondary effluent disinfected by UV-TiO2,” Huan Jing Ke Xue, 35(4), pp.1332-1336, 2014.